You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I really want to avoid the old proxy style option that did a bunch of magic stuff, it was not really transparent and it was confusing to users.
Sorry for not being clear - yes what I'm looking for would strictly be for validation on the server side, calling it proxy-mode makes perfect sense.
If we had something like that it would drive the settings more from the cli / runtime experience and require less comprehension of the docs, and we could convert several of our validation warnings to hard errors.
I'm not sure how the operator benefits
When the keycloak instance has both http and https enabled, the operator assumes the ingress is to use https. That isn't necessarily correct, it's just being done by convention. Having a way to differentiate based up the user's intention would be more correct.
This discussion was converted from issue #48409 on April 23, 2026 12:23.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Sorry for not being clear - yes what I'm looking for would strictly be for validation on the server side, calling it
proxy-modemakes perfect sense.If we had something like that it would drive the settings more from the cli / runtime experience and require less comprehension of the docs, and we could convert several of our validation warnings to hard errors.
When the keycloak instance has both http and https enabled, the operator assumes the ingress is to use https. That isn't necessarily correct, it's just being done by convention. Having a way to differentiate based up the user's intention would be more correct.
Originally posted by @shawkins in #48209 (comment)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions