Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Other option is, that we can improve the WebAuthn integration experience with authentication policies. The ideal experience is, that after single click "Enable WebAuthn as 2nd factor" will take care of register WebAuthn required action as well as using WebAuthn as authenticator. The design proposal for Authentication policies should come soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
@mposolda Could you elaborate the concept "Authentication Policies"? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently when WebAuthn is used, administrator needs to manually register WebAuthn related required actions
WebAuthn RegisterandWebAuthn Register Passwordless. I think that once WebAuthn become supported feature, it will makes sense to register WebAuthn related required actionsWebAuthn RegisterandWebAuthn Register Passwordlessin the new realm by default. This will be compatible with other required actions (EG. OTP registration) and it will simplify the WebAuthn setup for administrators.WDYT?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions