You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
which has the effect that LOOT will sort B.esp after A.esp with no other plugins between them.
Open Questions
Should directly_after be invalid for regex entries? It only makes sense for one match to use the value, but the regex entry may be for a set of exclusive plugins anyway.
How to handle merging metadata entries that specify different directly_after values?
How to handle the case where plugin masters and 'hard' metadata like after and req entries form a cycle with directly_after?
How to implement this - should it be part of the graph sort, or done as a post-topological sort "override" step?
@Kaenguru-Knobel-Kette has noted that it would be good idea to get the opinions of other compatibility patch authors on this, to see if their expectations or use cases differ.
Discussed in loot/skyrim#190 and loot/skyrim#245, the idea is to have something like
which has the effect that LOOT will sort B.esp after A.esp with no other plugins between them.
Open Questions
directly_afterbe invalid for regex entries? It only makes sense for one match to use the value, but the regex entry may be for a set of exclusive plugins anyway.directly_aftervalues?afterandreqentries form a cycle withdirectly_after?@Kaenguru-Knobel-Kette has noted that it would be good idea to get the opinions of other compatibility patch authors on this, to see if their expectations or use cases differ.