<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>pepyakin</title>
    
    
    
    <link>/</link>
    <description>Recent content on pepyakin</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:16:22 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Rethinking historical storage</title>
      <link>/posts/archive-nodes/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:16:22 +0200</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/posts/archive-nodes/</guid>
      <description>
        
          
          
          
        
        
        
          A proposal for more efficient archive nodes.
          
        
        </description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>It&#39;s all about light clients</title>
      <link>/posts/sca-and-light-clients/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 18:12:27 +0200</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/posts/sca-and-light-clients/</guid>
      <description>
        
          
          
          
        
        
        
          I discuss the notion of state commitment arguments and how they are used to build light clients.
          
        
        </description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Parachains Consensus Explainer</title>
      <link>/posts/parachains-consensus/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 14:11:26 +0100</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/posts/parachains-consensus/</guid>
      <description>
        
          
          
          
        
        
        
          Brief explaination of how Polkadot sharded consensus works.
          
        
        </description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Why Wasm is not the best format for Fraud Proofs</title>
      <link>/posts/wasm-fraud-proofs/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/posts/wasm-fraud-proofs/</guid>
      <description>
        
          
          
          
        
        
        
          In this article I&#39;ll dive into why Wasm isn&#39;t suited for interactive fraud proofs.
          
        
        </description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>