Skip to content

Update templates to add labels#876

Open
emmuhamm wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
emmuhamm/update-template-labels
Open

Update templates to add labels#876
emmuhamm wants to merge 2 commits intodevelopfrom
emmuhamm/update-template-labels

Conversation

@emmuhamm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@emmuhamm emmuhamm commented Apr 9, 2026

Description

A step in the right direction for #863

Updates the issue templates to highlight the fact that developers should label any new issues / PRs that they make.

Type of change

  • Documentation

Suggested manual testing checklist

N/A

Developer checklist

Prior to marking this as "Ready for Review"

Tests ran on: N/A from release N/A

Unit tests - some tests can't be ran on the CI. This is documented. If this PR checks a feature that can't be tested with CI, this has been marked appropriately.

Integration tests - the daqsystemtest_integtest_bundle requires a lot of resources, and connections to the EHN1 infrastructure. Check the cross referenced list if you can't run these. The developer needs to run at least the .

  • Unit tests (pytest --marker) passed
    • With relevant marker
    • Without marker
  • Integration tests passed
    • Only daqsystemtest_integtest_bundle.sh -k minimal_system_quick_test.py
    • Full daqsystemtest_integtest_bundle.sh
  • Testing skipped as there are no core code changes in this PR, this only relates to documentation/CI workflows

Final checklist prior to marking this as "Ready for Review"

  • Code is clearly commented.
  • New unit tests have been added, or is documented in # ISSUE NUMBER
  • A suitable reviewer has been chosen from this list.

Reviewer checklist

  • This branch has been rebased with develop prior to testing.
  • Suggested manual tests show changes.
  • CI workflows fails documented (if present)
  • Integration tests passed
    • Only concern yourself if failures related to drunc are in the log files
    • If non-drunc failure appears:
      • Validate failure in fresh working area
      • Contact Pawel if unsure

Once the features are validated and both the unit and integration tests pass, the PRs is ready to be merged.

Prior to merging

Choose one of the following an complete all substeps
  • Changes only affect the Run Control, are in a single repository, and do not affect the end user.
    • Changes are documented in docstrings and code comments
    • Wiki has been updated if architectural or endpoint changes
  • Otherwise
    • Workflow changes demonstrated in the Change Log (if necessary)
    • Wiki has been updated (if necessary)
    • #daq-sw-librarians Slack channel notified (see below)

Once completed, the reviewer can merge the PR.

Notification message for a Slack channel

Note - this should be to #dunedaq-integration for general workflow that isn't during a release candidate period, and to #daq-release-prep otherwise.

For an single merge that changes the user workflow

The CCM WG has an isolated PR ready to merge that affects user workflows. The PR is:

_URL_

I will leave time for any comments, otherwise will merge these at the end of the work day _Insert your time zone_.

For co-ordinated merge

The CCM WG has a set of co-ordinated merges ready to merge. The PRs are:

_URL_

_URL_


I will leave time for any comments, otherwise will merge these at the end of the day.

@emmuhamm emmuhamm self-assigned this Apr 9, 2026
@emmuhamm emmuhamm added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Apr 9, 2026
name: Bug Report
description: Report a bug in the system
title: "[Bug]: "
labels: ["bug"]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(As well for others)

Consider making a new label thats like 'triage' or similar and have it automatically added, so people are further reminded to assign topics.

@emmuhamm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@PawelPlesniak this should be ready for review. Desc is self explanatory

Note that I purposely kept the scope very minimal, just changing the issue and PR template

The more general github actions-like changes will come later, when I have time to investigate and implement :')

Comment thread .github/pull_request_template.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uncomment and test

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also tell kurt this exists! See if it can be included

  • include in nightly generation integration test
  • include drunc root in dunedaq db path (what what was discussed when talking about failure mode testing)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes implemented. Note that I used the full path to call the sh file (./scripts/drunc_integtest_bundle.sh) instead of the pytest -m integration_tests, not sure if we wanted to support the pytest thing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants