Open
Conversation
22 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes issue #792 #859
The
statustable now shows both user-friendly hostname and the actual endpoints that applications connect to:K8s session:
and in SSH session:
Type of change
List of required branches from other repositories
n/a
Change log
Add a helper function
get_endpoint_display_host_overridesto improve the readability of the controller status table display by replacing raw endpoint IPs with human-readable hostnames when available.Note it only overrides the table when a Process Manager is available, the mapping is populated from
ProcessDescription.metadata.hostnameThis allows Kubernetes node names (or other host metadata) to be used for display.
The default implementation returns {} (no overrides).
The change is purely cosmetic and should not affect connectivity or controller behaviour.
Suggested manual testing checklist
LIST COMMANDS TO DEMONSTRATE CHANGE
Developer checklist
Prior to marking this as "Ready for Review"
Tests ran on: np04 019, with NFD_DEV_260414_A9
Unit tests - some tests can't be ran on the CI. This is documented. If this PR checks a feature that can't be tested with CI, this has been marked appropriately.
Integration tests - the
daqsystemtest_integtest_bundlerequires a lot of resources, and connections to the EHN1 infrastructure. Check the cross referenced list if you can't run these. The developer needs to run at least the .pytest --marker) passeddaqsystemtest_integtest_bundle.sh -k minimal_system_quick_test.pydaqsystemtest_integtest_bundle.shFinal checklist prior to marking this as "Ready for Review"
Reviewer checklist
druncare in the log filesdruncfailure appears:Once the features are validated and both the unit and integration tests pass, the PRs is ready to be merged.
Choose one of the following an complete all substepsPrior to merging
Once completed, the reviewer can merge the PR.
Notification message for a Slack channel
Note - this should be to #dunedaq-integration for general workflow that isn't during a release candidate period, and to #daq-release-prep otherwise.
For an single merge that changes the user workflow
For co-ordinated merge