Conversation
|
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
WalkthroughThis PR adds a changeset declaring a patch update for Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.changeset/yellow-submarine-cookie.md:
- Line 5: Replace the current changeset description that begins with "Extra rule
source reference." so the first line follows the bug-fix format "Fixed
[`#NUMBER`](issue link): ..." and rewrite the body into 1–3 user-facing sentences
describing the user impact and what changed (avoid implementation/internal
details like "rule source reference"); ensure the message clearly states the
problem users experienced and the visible fix, then save the revised content in
the same changeset file.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: a6253e87-59a2-4b6e-ba8f-7584492269f7
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.changeset/yellow-submarine-cookie.mdcrates/biome_js_analyze/src/assist/source/use_sorted_keys.rs
Merging this PR will not alter performance
Comparing Footnotes
|
| "@biomejs/biome": patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Extra rule source reference. `biome migrate eslint` should do a bit better detecting rules in your eslint configurations. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please adhere to the contribution guidelines for changesets:
- use the past tense
- the phrase needs to target the end users.
For example "Extra rule source reference" doesn't mean anything to our users, as well as the second. Be precise (mention maybe which rules we are about to migrate)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mhm alright, have been using this changeset sentence when adding rule sources a few times already and I think once suggested by a core member 😅
Honestly, idk if the changeset is actually needed as inspired rule kinds won't be used in the migrate command (deleted the changeset)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If so, we can then remove the changset. The change is mostly for docs, then, which doesn't affect this package
Summary
Missing rule source
Test Plan
Docs