Migration of custom attribute mappers and custom providers #10291
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
|
@Coding-Mike Could you check if the info here [1] helps on that? Basically, you need to deploy your providers now within the If your provider does not need any configuration, that is it. If you could give more details about the changes you are doing to standalone.xml, perhaps I can help more. Regardless, we need to provide a specific guide I think or update the configuration guide for more details. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@pedroigor here is the content of the file used to update the standalone.xml configuration file I hope this helps to explain a solution. Kind regards |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@Coding-Mike Could you please check if this new guide helps you? See #10401. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@pedroigor thanks for your help. I already managed to do the migration. The new guide is also a great step ahead to help others in the migration process. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I currently use the following Dockerfile to create a custom configured docker image for the keycloak.
Now with the new Quarkus distribution I don't find a way how to adjust this so that I can use my custom mappers and providers with the new version.
Can someone guide me how to change the docker file to get this running again in the new non legacy version
Thanks in advance and kind regards
Michael
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions